Search for Free 150,000+ Essays

Find more results for this search now!
CLICK the BUTTON to the RIGHT!

Need a Brand New Custom Essay Now?  click here

An Analysis of the Policy cycle

Uploaded by princessvee on Mar 13, 2014

An analysis of the Policy Cycle

The policy cycle model (also referred to as ‘stages heuristic’ by Sabatier, 1999) is mainly concerned with the organisation and creation of public policy. The policy making approach is conceptualised as a process that provides a logical structure and sequence to the complex world of policy making. This essay begins with a description of the use of the policy cycle in policy formulation and examines the structure of the cycle as discussed in (Cairney 2012, p.32-35). The essay then provides an analysis of the effectiveness of the policy cycle approach in meeting the objectives of policy makers. Through this analysis it will be shown that the policy cycle model does not entirely achieve its stated aims and objectives.

The policy cycle approach views the formulating of policy as a fluid but logical sequence that provides policy makers a systematic problem solving process. (Cairney, 2011) Whilst the description of stages will vary from model to model, common stages that appear throughout many policy cycle models include agenda setting, decision-making, implementation and evaluation (p.33) Agenda setting stage is where problems that require government attention are identified and defined. At the decision making stage (or policy formulation) legislation is usually enacted. At the implementation stage, policies are translated into action, and, finally at the evaluation stage, the outcome of polices are assessed. (p33)

The stages are mostly presented in a circular format suggesting an uninterrupted flow from one stage of the cycle to the other. (Bridgman & Davis, 2003). The rationale for observing each stage separately is that decisions made at each stage affects the outcome of other stages, even when they occur simultaneously. It also suggests involvement of interest groups whose input, it is argued provides a democratic way to decision making and hypothetically, encourages greater participation and commitment at the implementation stage (p.36)

Although Cairney describes this approach as “the best known way to organize the study of policy making and the best way to introduce a discussion of policy theories”(p.32), it is also considered as overly simplistic, and lacking a causal theoretical basis. (p 41) As various authors cited by Cairney (2011) have argued, the stages often do not follow the logical progression. Furthermore it tends to suggest a “top down” and elitist bias, which fails to acknowledge or monitor success where it matters (p.41). It also fails to explain how difficult decisions are made (Bridgman...

Sign In Now to Read Entire Essay

Not a Member?   Create Your FREE Account »

Comments / Reviews

read full essay >>

Already a Member?   Login Now >

This essay and THOUSANDS of
other essays are FREE at eCheat.

Uploaded by:   princessvee

Date:   03/13/2014

Category:   Social Sciences

Length:   2 pages (551 words)

Views:   3722

Report this Essay Save Essay
Professionally written essays on this topic:

An Analysis of the Policy cycle

View more professionally written essays on this topic »