Student's Response to the Attacks of September 11th
Student's Response to the Attacks of September 11th
According to the September 22nd edition of Star-Ledger, Professor Richard Falk of Princeton University stated, “the mainstream media have turned into a 'war-mobilizing mechanism' leading to intense indoctrination of the public in support of a military response…We are living in a society that is so convinced of its own innocence that it is ready to embark on its own 'holy war’”. He emphasized that if and when the United States decides to use force, it should do so only in conformance with international law and according to the principles of a "just" war. Falk continues by saying "These would include making it illegal to target non-military sites or people, making sure the response is proportionate and ensuring that no unnecessary pain is inflicted. In Bush's address (Thursday night) I saw no signs of sensitivity to any of these limits, no deference to the authority of the United Nations" .
Contrary to Professor Falk’s opinion, the leaders of our country do consider the factors of collateral damage before undertaking actions of war. In addition, the complexities and possible outcomes of the military action are measured against the criterion of a "just war." A similar discussion ensued prior to the Gulf War, before moving to turn back Iraq's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. There was a good interview on the CNN website on the topic of a “just war.” This interview in particular gave multiple points as to fair and just wars.
I do not believe there is any disagreement that non-violent methods of resolving conflicts must always be used, even if there is a chance of minimal success. Unfortunately, peaceful means do not always produce the best resolution to conflict. When war seems inevitable, it is important for the country’s leaders to determine if a war-like conflict is “just”. This mode of thoughtful decision-making dates back to St. Augustine and has been highly developed over the centuries; initially among Catholic theologians, but the principles have become generally accepted, as Professor Falk's own statements imply. It rests on the lawful right to self-defense when other methods have failed.
Making a commitment to a “just war” must meet four criteria, not just the one cited by Professor Falk. First, the damage inflicted by the aggressor on the nation or community of nations must be grave, lasting and certain. Second, all other means of...