SEARCH RESULTS

YOU WERE LOOKING FOR :Accounting Principles Based Or Rules Based

Essays 2461 - 2490

4th Amendment of the US Constitution and the Exclusionary Rule

when Fourth Amendment concepts have been violated, the Supreme Court often applies what is called the exclusionary rule (McWhirter...

Burning Brides in India

In eight pages the extent to which patriarchy rules India is examined within the context of the shameful practice of burning bride...

Gender and the The Victorian Age

In ten pages the gender roles and rules associated with the Victorian Age are considered in an analysis of A Room with a View by E...

Colonial Rule by the Portuguese and Spanish

In twelve pages this research paper discusses the territories ruled by the colonial governments of Portugal and Spain. Six source...

Richard J. Daley, Mayor of Chicago

In seven pages the tenure of Richard J. Daley's rule as mayor of Chicago from 1955 to 1976 is discussed. Four sources are cited i...

Feminist Views on Women in Afghanistan Under the Taliban Rule

An article on the Taliban rule in Afghanistan and how it has oppressed women is discussed through an application of Joan Scott's f...

Protocol of Public Schools and the US Constitution's 4th Amendment

The case is clearly poignant in a sea of cases concerning individual rights and freedoms. It is certainly apropos in todays climat...

UK and Medical Negligence

the case often cited to explain this. The judge in Bolam ruled that there can be two or more schools of thought in respect to prio...

Democratic Rule According to Niccolo Machiavelli, Aristotle, and Plato

influential thinkers of the ancient age. Despite their obvious inter-related lives, they still had significantly differing opinio...

Character Evidence in American Courts

is largely responsible for the direction that evidence law reform has taken over the last one hundred years. To Thayer and his co...

West Africa, West Central Africa, and Slavery's Consequences

names which come up when talking about slavery. These coastal areas certainly seemed to suffer. A larger chunk of Africa suffered ...

Comparative Analysis of Detective Works Murders in the Rue Morgue by Edgar Allan Poe and The Second Deadly Sin by Lawrence Sanders

by the brilliance and deductive reasoning that the detective uses. Agatha Christies Hercule Poirot is reminiscent of a brilliant d...

Balkans and Ottoman Empire

to how this history impacted the Balkans, explores these arguments and evaluates these two opposing positions. Background Only 8...

Individual Character and Ethics

and do this? This provides an example of a moral individual who is placed in a slightly unmoral situation. In this regard,...

Departure Rule, Real Estate, and USPAP

words, the Departure Rule adds flexibility to the USPAP standards - if an appraisal job occurs that may be outside the realm of th...

Joseph Chamberlain and William Gladstone

can be of benefit, increasing diversity and as such bettering political decision with constant challenges. It was the challenges p...

Justice, Professional Football, and Minority Coaches

Yet is it just to have such a rule in place? Furthermore is a just for a professional football team to be fined, simply because th...

Ethics and Making Decisions

to be stopped by the police following a fight then it is easier to make the decision to report him, rather than if the explanation...

Tracing Proprietary Claims on Sham Trusts under Common Law and Equity Law

this is an approach which is particularly applicable to chattels which are easier to identify as specific items (Martin and Turne...

Motivation And Reward Systems

on the job. Some even offer pet insurance as one of the newer incentives. Which combination of benefits a company offers is diff...

The Rule of Law

a just and caring world, it helps to get rid of criminal leaders. Again, the notion that the rule of law applies to everyone is re...

Kelo v. New London

before the New London Superior Court, asserting that the "taking of their properties would violate the public use restriction in t...

Jedidiah Smith’s fate, Irony and Immigration

a nineteenth century war that the U.S. initiated with Mexico. Teacher Bill Bigelow describes how a traditional history textbook c...

The Devil Wears Prada: The Glass Ceiling

are called "driven" or "committed" - but when used by women results in them being characterized as "bitches" or even sex-starved, ...

The Internet and The Perfect Tender Rule

are not responsible if the television does not perform. After all, the product being sold is something more than a steel box. It i...

“Benjamin v. Lindner Aviation, Inc.”

came forward to claim the money with the prescribed time (a year), and at that point, Benjamin filed "this declaratory judgment ag...

GMAC v. Raju

before the court: The defendant defaulted and the plaintiff definitively proved that GMAC has "a right to copyright and trademark ...

Contract Law

rule that "money damages do not constitute an adequate remedy for the breach of a real estate contract" (Iowa Supreme Court, 1977)...

How And Why Companies Benefit From Customers Breaking Rules

a fair value service. There are a large number of examples that demonstrate the way that companies can benefit from custome...

Reading: The Rule of Law and Military Tribunals

the most immoral atrocities ever committed, but it was not enough for the Allies to condemn them morally: "... this was to be a le...