SEARCH RESULTS

YOU WERE LOOKING FOR :Antibigamy Laws and Appeling to the Utah Court of Appeals

Essays 31 - 60

The ADA, Two Supreme Court Cases

This research paper pertains to 2 Supreme Court cases involved the provisions of the the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of ...

llegality of Assisted Suicide in Regards to the 14th Amendment

This 5 page paper provides an overview of a case where physicians were sued for assisting terminal patients with suicide and were ...

Juvenile and Adult Courts: A Comparative Study:

vary somewhat from state to state, juvenile justice typically has a similar protocol. At the time a juvenile is arrested, a decis...

Preventing Sexual Harassment in Tennessee

president of a state university keeping his job but also being sanctioned for his behavior in Allen v. McPhee (2007). Preventing S...

The Use of Deadly Force in Effecting Arrest

reversed the lower Courts ruling and found the Tennessee statute unconstitutional because it authorized the use of deadly force ev...

Twenty First Century Policing

Policing today shares many similarities with policing of any particular era. At the same time...

A Case of Trademark Confusion

properly! The development of trademark law was based on the desire to protect the interests of companies and to allow for distinc...

Shield Laws and Children's Testifying in Courts

In twenty pages shield laws' impacts are examined within the context of the problems associated with children required to testify ...

Canada's Abortion Laws

This is a paper consisting of ten pages and discusses the topic of abortion as it relates to Canadian law and includes the 'Bubble...

Canada's Struggle With Child Pornography

p.PG). Courts in the West have been struggling with the definition for quite awhile as they try to keep a balance for the right ...

Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge and Ashworth Frazer v Gloucester CC Judgments

the interests of the assignee, Ashworth Frazer Ltd., who would have interpreted the relevant subclauses in a reasonable manner bas...

UK Criminal Law and the Intent to Kill

D was aware it was a virtually certain consequence ... . and if D foresaw the death as an overwhelming possibility" (Clark, 2000)....

Should Federal Courts Review State Death Penalty Cases?

was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly establish [sic] federal law as determined by the Supreme Cour...

Amazon.com and Internet Jurisdiction

have been forced to cease operations. Today Amazon maintains sites in Austria, Canada, China, France, Germany, Japan, the United ...

Drug Testing and the Constitution

right to work doctrine is not necessarily the rule of employment. For instance, in Texas, an employee challenged her employers man...

Judge Interpretation of the 1967 Abortion Act and the Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v DHSS (1981) Case

Radioactive Substances Act 1948, section 3 (1) (a), the Therapeutic Substances Act 1956, section 9 (1) (a); the Drugs (Prevention...

Victoria Supreme Court Case of Parish v Smyrnos

door bell ring at an early hour, that she looked outside and saw a naked man with an erect penis (2003). She was frightened. This...

'Fear Appeals' and Public Service Advertising

In five pages this paper assesses whether or not public service ads that evoke reader or viewer fear are successful. There are 4 ...

The Appeal of a Federal Law Enforcement Career

This paper provides reasons why the author chose to study Federal law enforcement at the graduate level. This three page paper ha...

History Of The Miranda Law

anyone who is considered to be a criminal suspect must be informed of their constitutional rights prior to any legal inquiry. One...

The Supreme Court: Role Played In The American Political Process

physician assisted suicide and affirmative action most certainly involves heated discussions in the courtroom, however, it is not ...

The Culture and Operation of the Special Court in Sierra Leone

The Sierra Leone Special Court is an Ad Hoc court set up to hear the cases of those most responsible the atrocities in the Sierra ...

Hendrick Hudson v. Rowley (1982)

the States must fulfill in order to receive federal funds under the Education of the Handicapped Act (subsequently referred as "th...

Assessing a Potential Development Area

In terms of access there is easy access, Northampton itself is just on a major motorway, the M1, this is undergoing widening at ma...

Should The United States Become A Member Of The International Criminal Court?

open itself up to unyielding vulnerability. Madison addressed the inherent need for mans activities to remain under some semblanc...

Adult Court Versus Juvenile Court

2005). It would take until the 1980s before all youth were taken out of adult jails and removed to separate facilities (Krisberg, ...

Is the Supreme Court Protecting the Rights of Americans to Equality?

This 3 page paper argues that the Supreme Court’s decisions in Loving and Brown v. Board of Education demonstrate its ability to p...

Afghanistan National Development Strategy (ANDS)

Security; Governance Rule of Law & Human Rights; Infrastructure & Natural Resources; Education; Health; Agriculture & Rural Develo...

Moylan v. Estes

brought together. Procedural History: This case came to the appellant court on appeal to a lower courts decision in favor of the...

Beatrice C. Mosionier/In Search of April Raintree

It has never been out of print since its publication and has been translated into "French, German and Dutch" (Taillon 16). Written...